Interesting, if valid
Jun. 30th, 2006 09:24 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This thing from Microsoft claims to predict demographics based on search terms used and urls visited. It reckons for example that if you're reading this journal you're 51% likely to be male and 47% likely to be 24 or under, whereas for LiveJournal as a whole the figures are 54% and 49% respectively, and for
venta* it's 50% and 45%. It also throws up different results for individual posts, althoug some return no result.
No clue as to where their base data comes from, maybe from evil monitoring within people's Internet Explorers?
* (Picked purely at random as I happened to have her journal open at the time.)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
No clue as to where their base data comes from, maybe from evil monitoring within people's Internet Explorers?
* (Picked purely at random as I happened to have her journal open at the time.)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-30 09:05 am (UTC)"Monopoly trial? Not with national security at risk, Mr. Supreme Court Judge."
no subject
Date: 2006-06-30 09:17 am (UTC)"... or userId 39H4tF7***PG15, as we laughingly refer to you back in Redmond."
no subject
Date: 2006-06-30 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-30 12:09 pm (UTC)Are they saying that 18-year-olds are most likely to enjoy the stuff on my journal? Or what?
no subject
Date: 2006-06-30 01:08 pm (UTC)Either that or they apply a big under-18 boost to everything on LiveJournal.