undyingking: (Default)
[personal profile] undyingking
Interesting (I thought) story recently about Julie Nicholson, a vicar who has resigned from her post because she's found herself unable to forgive the London bomber who killed her daughter.
Probably anyone who's not a Christian is thinking "and why should she forgive the bastard?", but I suppose this is about as close as you can get to the central mystery of Christianity -- what makes it different to other religions. There's loads of stuff in the Bible making it very clear that Jesus thought forgiving those who'd done you harm, however difficult, was of fundamental importance. Of course he wouldn't have condemned this poor woman who's suffering dreadfully, but he would understand her wanting to step down from her pastoral role if she feels it not sustainable with integrity. (Of course, Jesus didn't agree with the idea of a priesthood at all, as far as we can make out, but that's a different story.)
The obvious parallel is with Anthony Walker's mother, also a Christian, who has been able to forgive her son's murderers. I guess a lot of people will think that's weird, unnatural, or that there must be some unacknowledged level at which she doesn't really forgive them. But it seems to me from what she's said that she has made the leap to empathize with them, with where they're coming from and why they might have acted as they did.
Could I forgive my child's killers? To be honest it's difficult to see how I might be able to. (It's also rather hypothetical, as I don't have any children.) But Jesus didn't urge this just because he thought we should all be fluffy bunnies -- but because it's not possible to be a whole functional person while you're carrying that sort of hatred aroud with you. Julie Nicholson says "for the time being, that wound in me is having to heal", and I guess we can all hope that eventually it will.

Date: 2006-03-16 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
but because it's not possible to be a whole functional person while you're carrying that sort of hatred aroud with you

This makes forgiveness sound like it's a kind of coping mechanism. That's an interesting way of looking at it, but I'm not sure that's quite the message Christianity looks to send. It's supposed to be a message of hope, not a message of denial.

Date: 2006-03-16 06:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
"Coping mechanism" is a bit of a loaded term, but I think that the healing effect of not bearing grudges against those who've wronged you is an important part of the Christian message (eg. I think this is what Jesus is talking about in Matthew 5:44-45). I wouldn't call that a message of denial, quite the contrary -- it's the hope that whatever misfortunes you've suffered need not leave permanent scars on you.
Of course, that's just my personal interpretation, and I'm sure plenty of people would say different, with more authority.

Date: 2006-03-16 06:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
I wouldn't call that a message of denial, quite the contrary -- it's the hope that whatever misfortunes you've suffered need not leave permanent scars on you.

Hmm... then perhaps I could less cynically word it as: hope in cases where the odds are stacked most unfavourably against you. (By which I mean "against one", but that looked silly when I wrote it.)

Not that I don't like the idea of people bouncing back from things, but that hasn't been my experience of the way people work. We're fragile things. Hit us with something bad enough and our mental state is damaged, never to be fully restored.

Date: 2006-03-17 09:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
Hit us with something bad enough and our mental state is damaged, never to be fully restored

Sure, but some people observably have better resilience than others, or may draw the 'unrecoverably bad' line in a different place -- and faith can be one of the factors affecting that. At least, that's the theory.

Date: 2006-03-17 09:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
In the case of a person who really believes, I think it makes a lot of sense. I'm sure I'd feel better about a child's death if I believed death wasn't final.

Date: 2006-03-16 09:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackfirecat.livejournal.com
you don't have to be religious to wonder about stuff like this, forgiveness or not. You possibly do need to be religious (or just an obessive googler) to check out Matthew 5:44-45. An even tougher precept than forgiveness, that.

But as atheist, my worry is about whether as you suggest it's healing to forgive, or if it's being a patsy. I'm undecided. I have no personal axe to grind here, should be clear. Just putting myself in other's shoes.

I think it's a good legal system that decides what to do with people irrespective of the victim's (or victim's families') wishes for this very reason - allows you to forgive or not as you choose without impacting on what the state/society does. (In general. I have a story about the downside but will sit on it.)

whether as you suggest it's healing to forgive

Date: 2006-03-17 09:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
I'm suggesting that it may be healing if you've got the right psycho-spiritual apparatus around it. Of course it may also be being a patsy, they're not exclusive. St Martin may have felt spiritually wonderful after giving the beggar his cloak, but I bet he still got a cold.

(I also think that the victim's wishes should be kept out of the legal system -- but, to me, if that's better for the victim that's just a beneficial side-effect. The main thing is that "justice" can only be conveyed by the polity at large, not by the people directly concerned.)

Forgiveness

Date: 2006-03-29 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Forgiveness is not for the person who sinned against us. Forgiveness is for us. Jesus commands us (it is not a suggestion) to forgive those who sin against us or God will not forgive us (Matthew 6:14-15). He does not say forgive others their sins or God won't forgive them either. Forgivness is so we don't lose our salvation. The person(s) who sinned against you must repent of their sins themselves. And forgiveness does not mean we hold them blameless, if they sinned against us then they are to blame. We just don't let it consume us. We don't let the sun set on our anger (Ephesians 4:26). And it certainly does not mean we have to embrace and hug those who caused us grevious harm, or invite them over to dinner. This belief is rubbish.

Re: Forgiveness

Date: 2006-04-05 03:32 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I absolutely agree, forgiveness doesn't eliminate the need for justice. If someone has done something wrong they should be punished for it. (bring back hanging)

Profile

undyingking: (Default)
undyingking

March 2012

S M T W T F S
     123
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 05:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios