Limbo dancing
Dec. 1st, 2005 04:41 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm sure that like me you were all excited to learn that the new Pope is considering abolishing Limbo.
I find this a bit of a puzzle. When Limbo first entered church doctrine in the Middle Ages, it was put across as "at last we've worked out what's happened to the souls of virtuous pagans, unbaptized babies and so on". So how can you just abolish it? Where are they now going to say those souls are? Or can they possibly admit that the whole thing's a bit of an absurd intellectual exercise best forgotten about? And if so, what about transubstantiation, the immaculate conception, the trinity and all the other intellectual exercises, enforced compliance with which has caused so much death, suffering etc?
I find this a bit of a puzzle. When Limbo first entered church doctrine in the Middle Ages, it was put across as "at last we've worked out what's happened to the souls of virtuous pagans, unbaptized babies and so on". So how can you just abolish it? Where are they now going to say those souls are? Or can they possibly admit that the whole thing's a bit of an absurd intellectual exercise best forgotten about? And if so, what about transubstantiation, the immaculate conception, the trinity and all the other intellectual exercises, enforced compliance with which has caused so much death, suffering etc?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 04:58 pm (UTC)In the modern world it makes a lot of sense to back off from such things. Presumably it doesn't appear in the bible anyway (he asked ignorantly) ?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:07 pm (UTC)Limbo was concocted in the 13th century as a solution to the theological conundrum of what happened to babies who died before they were christened.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:10 pm (UTC)Like you I am pretty ignorant of such things, but surely this (replacing the word 'physical' with 'actual') is the standard view for a good catholic? I don't think the loss of 'physical' is significant, because to all intents and purposes any 'actual' place might as well be 'physical' even if technically it isn't.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:26 pm (UTC)There are those who might say that the Bible is a mess of contradictory gibberish and that He has a rap sheet containing plenty of suggestions that putting your faith in His mercy could not be one of the better bets of your career.
My specialist subject, however, is 'Mormons, complete toss or what?' so I could be wrong.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:14 pm (UTC)I agree with what you say -- but I think the same is true of transubstantiation, in that it seems to me that the symbolic power of the Eucharist is just as powerfully conveyed by consubstantiation or even memorialism -- but Catholic insistence on the literal in this was enough to massacre the Huguenots, etc.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:26 pm (UTC)I think the consistency of 'the word' isn't really a worry for top-end religious ppl - which is part of the huge mismatch in mindset between them and scientists, philosophers and the like. Aquinas probably came up with the Limbo idea cos he wanted more consistency in the model.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:31 pm (UTC)Although the period roughly 4th-9th century AD, where there's an analogous tension between theology and crude, dirty politics -- see the shenanigans at the various ecumenical councils -- is even more interesting, from a safe distance, I think.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:31 pm (UTC)Actually, the film Dogma is relevant here, because the problem "solved" by Limbo and the crux of the film both come down to the effects of dogmatic infallibilty. If the idea of "except" could be incorporated, or more general the ability to revise ideas, then the argument would, if not cease, then certainly become less knotty.
Or, to put it as the Catholic Father Emil does somewhere in the tale of Lake Wobegon (Leaving Home, I think): "Lutheranism is my idea of a holiday. To take those truths we find difficult, and bend them a little to make life easier. Yes, Luther was a great man all right"
To take those truths we find difficult, and bend them a little to make life easier
Date: 2005-12-01 05:34 pm (UTC)Re: To take those truths we find difficult, and bend them a little to make life easier
Date: 2005-12-01 05:44 pm (UTC)Actually, for all its "gee, ain't small towns NEAT" cutesieness, the whole Lake Wobegon milieu (Garrison Keillor) is worth investigating, ideally in talking book form...
Re: To take those truths we find difficult, and bend them a little to make life easier
Date: 2005-12-01 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
no subject
Date: 2005-12-03 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-03 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 10:09 pm (UTC)PS: I read limbo dancing too
no subject
Date: 2005-12-02 08:38 am (UTC)Ah, I didn't know that, interesting! In that case I guess you could hypothesize that the notions of "justice" expressed in Christianity are maybe purely a result of the infusion of Classical Greek philosophy.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-02 09:46 pm (UTC)The Catholic church is a strange one, isn't it? Encyclicals have embraced evolution and non-literal reading of the Bible, unlike the happy-clappy hair-shirts across the Atlantic; the modern-day Catholic church would not show the instuments of torture to Galileo or burn Bruno,and I don't think anyone suffered for plate tectonics, but they are still a bit slow.. on condoms, for instance. (and transubstantiation, as you say, but that's less of a life-and-death issue these days.)
What is all this heaven and hell stuff anyway? Surely everyone's dead until the day of judgement? Says the atheist.
Surely everyone's dead until the day of judgement?
Date: 2005-12-03 05:10 pm (UTC)Mm, there's always a suspicion that the resistance to condoms and abortion is more to do with demographic wishfullness than doctrine.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-21 03:41 am (UTC)He went into great length about how following the letter of the law to the fullest extent possible was an observation in its own right, within tradition and scripture, and that the reason for a law was therefore irrelevant. You can be fairly sure he didn't approve of Reform...
following the letter of the law to the fullest extent possible was an observation in its own right
Date: 2005-12-21 01:19 pm (UTC)