undyingking: (Default)
[personal profile] undyingking
That'll do for now! So a quick poll, if you'll indulge me:
[Poll #1527090]

Date: 2010-02-18 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Ticky note: I ticked the WikiLeaks box on the basis that it was interesting to me when I first encountered it, which wasn't here.

Also, I think you may be overlooking some aspects of the profile pic thing. OK Cupid seem very bad at analysing (or predicting) their results, but potentially there's some really interesting social psychology data there. And it could be very serious indeed if the same results were shown to hold up under statistically sound test conditions. Assuming we mean "serious" in the sense of "providing valid and valuable analysis".

Date: 2010-02-19 09:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
Mm, I wonder if there is actually an extant body of academic research around this area. With lots of tame students on tap, you'd think it would be easy and cheap enough to set up. Journal of Headline-Friendly Social Psychology perhaps?

Profile

undyingking: (Default)
undyingking

March 2012

S M T W T F S
     123
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 07:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios