Perverse incentives
Sep. 29th, 2011 06:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Heard recently that the govt is going ahead with bringing in a subsidy for domestic solar hot water systems, whereby you get paid 18p or so per kWh of heat that you generate (as well as saving off your gas bill, of course).
It's estimated that a typical 20-tube installation on a south-facing roof will pull down somewhere around £400-500 for you per year through this subsidy: not bad.
There is a snag, though, which is that the subsidy isn't payable for installations on houses with combi boilers: only for those with the more traditional cylinder-plus-boiler setup. Not because there is any technical drawback to using solar-heated feed to a combi, or efficiency penalty, or anything like that: that's not an issue. It's simply a policy decision.
This is probably a bit galling for anyone who thought they were being nice and eco-friendly by installing a combi boiler, as previous govts persistently urged us all to do. But fair enough, maybe they are thinking that encouraging solar adaptation of older boiler systems is going to clean up more of the low-hanging carbon-emission fruit.
But this is where the title of this post comes in. It'll cost you about £3000 (say) to rip out your lovely efficient new combi boiler and replace it with a cylinder-plus-boiler system. With the subsidy guaranteed to rise with inflation for 20 years, you'd repay that and be quids in before too long.
Hmm.
It's estimated that a typical 20-tube installation on a south-facing roof will pull down somewhere around £400-500 for you per year through this subsidy: not bad.
There is a snag, though, which is that the subsidy isn't payable for installations on houses with combi boilers: only for those with the more traditional cylinder-plus-boiler setup. Not because there is any technical drawback to using solar-heated feed to a combi, or efficiency penalty, or anything like that: that's not an issue. It's simply a policy decision.
This is probably a bit galling for anyone who thought they were being nice and eco-friendly by installing a combi boiler, as previous govts persistently urged us all to do. But fair enough, maybe they are thinking that encouraging solar adaptation of older boiler systems is going to clean up more of the low-hanging carbon-emission fruit.
But this is where the title of this post comes in. It'll cost you about £3000 (say) to rip out your lovely efficient new combi boiler and replace it with a cylinder-plus-boiler system. With the subsidy guaranteed to rise with inflation for 20 years, you'd repay that and be quids in before too long.
Hmm.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-29 06:45 pm (UTC)(We have a boiler+cylinder at present - although the boiler will probably need replacing in the next few years anyway)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-30 07:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-30 09:33 am (UTC)Hmmm. Anyway, thanks for mentioning the subsidy. My boiler's coming to the end of its useful lifem and I've been considering replacing it with a system that incorporates solar thermal in any case. Unfortunately my roof faces more NW-SE than N-S, so I might have to have panels both sides to make it worthwhile. Still, the subsidy will help the justification nicely.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-30 10:45 am (UTC)I suspect though that, as eg. combi boilers are specified in building regs for new houses, it is just that a list of certain boiler models are designated as officially combis and that's that, however you subsequently tinker with them.
There is some confusion over when the subsidy is going to come in. It was originally supposed to be this April, then it seemed like it was cancelled altogehter, now maybe next April or maybe sooner than that.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-03 08:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-03 08:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-30 10:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-30 11:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-30 11:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-30 12:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-30 02:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-30 12:21 pm (UTC)