My goodness
Aug. 3rd, 2010 02:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Does anyone know (or care to speculate), what's the origin of the phrase template "full of [noun]-y goodness"?
It sounds like it ought to have come from an advert or something. But it's been used for so long with the speaker's choice of interpolated noun, I have no idea at all what the original might have been.
It sounds like it ought to have come from an advert or something. But it's been used for so long with the speaker's choice of interpolated noun, I have no idea at all what the original might have been.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:09 pm (UTC)I think it comes from a Harry Enfield and/or Paul Whitehouse character. I have vague recollections of something before the Fast Show cheesy peas, but I can't remember what exactly. Obviously it might have pre-dated that usage.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 04:07 pm (UTC)Before clicking through to this comment page, I thought "meaty goodness" and non-specific dog food, but suddenly I'm curious to know whether Cadbury's Fudge has prior art or not.
Boutros Boutros Ghali.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 11:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:36 pm (UTC)(It does however achieve breathtaking levels of retro awfulness!)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:48 pm (UTC)Gosh, that seems dreadfully dated for something from only 20-odd years ago. "When your husband's away..."!
no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 07:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 08:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 03:22 pm (UTC)all too true
Date: 2010-08-03 08:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 08:09 pm (UTC)I still would, because Americans didn't see these adverts, and therefore through Buffy into the mainstream, or the mill-stream of the mainstream that we inhabit.
There's a book about Buffyspeak... by OUP.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-05 05:32 pm (UTC)The ad seemed to work on reverse psychology; if the product was "small and neat" and "just enough to give your kids a treat" then it was something they could eat between meals. Also tried with Milky Way: "The sweet you can eat between meals without losing your appetite"
Not to be confused with the American Milky Way, which we know as a Mars bar.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-06 02:28 pm (UTC)Ooh, I didn't know that. Interesting, I wonder why. Mind you I suppose a Mars bar is basically a squashed Milky Way with caramel shoved on top.