Fantastic Mr Fox
Nov. 5th, 2009 04:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I had been vaguely aware that there was a new, animated film of Fantastic Mr Fox around, but it wasn't until just recently that I realized it was by Wes Anderson. So I went to see it, with T, last night.
I really enjoyed it -- in ways that have very, very little to do with the Roald Dahl book. Anderson has taken that as a loose jumping-off point, and gone off into several unusual dimensions. If you liked Rushmore, The Royal Tenenbaums, or The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, you will like this film. Basically it's full of silly, hugely inventive, and slightly strange moments. And the animation is really nice too -- it's unusual these days to see stop-motion at the big cinema, apart from Aardman stuff.
Sample dialogue:
[Poll #1481182]
I really enjoyed it -- in ways that have very, very little to do with the Roald Dahl book. Anderson has taken that as a loose jumping-off point, and gone off into several unusual dimensions. If you liked Rushmore, The Royal Tenenbaums, or The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, you will like this film. Basically it's full of silly, hugely inventive, and slightly strange moments. And the animation is really nice too -- it's unusual these days to see stop-motion at the big cinema, apart from Aardman stuff.
Sample dialogue:
Mr. Fox: [sighs] Who am I, Kylie?
Kylie: Who how? What now?
Mr. Fox: Why a fox? Why not a horse, or a beetle, or a bald eagle? I'm saying this more as, like, existentialism, you know? Who am I? And how can a fox ever be happy without, you'll forgive the expression, a chicken in its teeth?
Kylie: I don't know what you're talking about, but it sounds illegal.
[Poll #1481182]
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:06 pm (UTC)I'm not entirely convinced by Anderson, The Royal Tenenbaums being a pretty good example of why. As a film it felt to me like someone trying to make The Hotel New Hampshire and failing; the oddities and quirkiness just seemed too contrived and self-conscious to really charm.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:37 pm (UTC)I think of the three, Fox is closest to the Steve Zissou feel.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:44 pm (UTC)I've not seen Rushmore or The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, so if they're considered better than his other films I'll watch them before I finalise judgement on Mr. Anderson.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:43 pm (UTC)(This House is Condemned - on Spotify's "Artist Radio" for Pulp)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:28 pm (UTC)Hm. I liked Life Aquatic a lot, but thought the Royal Tenenbaums was a complete waste of a couple of hours I'll never have back...
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 08:33 pm (UTC)She didn't comment on the dialogue though, apparently it was "about a mister fox who likes to eat chickens even though he's actually a goody".
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 07:19 am (UTC)But the trailer for Mr. Fox looked _awful_. Really low frame rate, and the characters looked like the results of a beginners taxidermy class. A fact highlighted by the main film after the trailers, which showed how animal fur should be done.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 09:37 am (UTC)Mm, I never saw the Fox trailer, which is fortunate as by all accounts it might well have put me off.