TagClouder
Mar. 2nd, 2006 12:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've added a feature to the TagClouder such that it now offers you the raw HTML to paste into your own page, etc. Unfortunately it comes out like this:
books car
Presumably LJ is stripping out the <style> ... </style> for security reasons or some such... any thoughts for ways round this? I could go back to doing it with text attributes I suppose, but that seems a bit retrograde...
Any thoughts about this or further improvements welcome!
Edit: now a trial with no internal style spec, but linking to an external stylesheet:
books car
Bah, no better.
Edit: now a trial with inline style:
books car
oho! -- that looks more promising. Unfortuatnely it involves hacking into the <a> tag, which I'm keen to avoid doing as it will require all manner of hideous regexping. And it this way really any better than using <font>?
books car
Get your own tag cloud from the UKG TagClouder!
Presumably LJ is stripping out the <style> ... </style> for security reasons or some such... any thoughts for ways round this? I could go back to doing it with text attributes I suppose, but that seems a bit retrograde...
Any thoughts about this or further improvements welcome!
Edit: now a trial with no internal style spec, but linking to an external stylesheet:
books car
Get your own tag cloud from the UKG TagClouder!
Bah, no better.
Edit: now a trial with inline style:
books car
Get your own tag cloud from the UKG TagClouder!
oho! -- that looks more promising. Unfortuatnely it involves hacking into the <a> tag, which I'm keen to avoid doing as it will require all manner of hideous regexping. And it this way really any better than using <font>?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 01:19 pm (UTC)It's not stripping out the style tags, as an examination of the source for this page shows:
The problem, of course, is that it doesn't have any definitions in the CSS for what those styles should look like :(
(Reposted using blockquote tags, rather than pre tags, in order to improve the resulting layout)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 03:55 pm (UTC)So, on your site
And for export:
Which isn't really a great advantage, but it does mean that the rest of the content is unchanged.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:the hopes that I can reclaim those thanks
From: