ext_366293 ([identity profile] mrlloyd.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] undyingking 2009-12-30 02:16 pm (UTC)

What I liked about this one was that England actually constructed their innings in the dominant way good sides do. Partnerships were built and lasted, batsmen alternated the effort nicely, with the possible exception of Broad and Bell both playing slowly.

No mini-collapses and dramatic revivals, it was an absolutely dominant victory, and the SA collapse will have got both their batsmen and bowlers worried.

Could we really be good at cricket?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting