undyingking: (Default)
undyingking ([personal profile] undyingking) wrote2008-05-15 11:56 am
Entry tags:

Couple of tabs

Yay, I finally got some money from Predictify. This is the site where you make wisdom-of-crowds type predictions, and if they turn out to be correct, you get a share in the money put up by whoever it was wanted to know the answer. I've so far shared in about 35 payouts, the biggest being $12.86 for predicting Clinton's % share of the vote in the Iowa caucus, and I've made a total of $41.42 (over a period of about 6 months). Which puts me 125th in the rankings -- the most successful predictor has made over $200.
I must admit that I'm highly doubtful about the business model1, and I was wondering whether they were ever going to be able to afford to actually pay out. But they had a venture capital round to raise the money to do so. Click here if you'd like to give it a go!

In sadder news, one of my favourite webcomics, Rice Boy, has finished. I've probably talked about this before, but if you missed that, it's a fabulously strange and beautiful thing. The Wikipedia entry seems rather baffled but gives a little idea. Anyway, read it, it's great.


1 Partly beause the "game" aspect of it is somewhat broken, and when players realize this, they stop behaving in a business-helpful way. I can go into more detail about this, if anyone's interested (don't all rush at once though).

[identity profile] thecesspit.livejournal.com 2008-05-16 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Taking a later risky answer seems very much as you suggest. They need to get answers in quickly.. and probably not by showing what others have already voted/predicted (which it seems to do at the moment, I can't see the guesses).

Some of the self-posted questions are pretty awful... partially bound, or vague.

Personally, I can't see anyone chipping out $500 to get a bunch of interweb users to guess the Length of the King of China's Nose.... even in cases (such as voting) where it can be useful. For a lot of things I can get the info for free by visiting Betfair/Oddschecker for an rough idea of the wisdom of the crowds (works well for politics/ents polls at least).

Course, these sites also useful for making a few quid out of the foolish occasionally (like the 4-1 odds I got on Bush winning the 2004 election at 1am UK time, based on one Al Gore state win, which he was always going to win).

[identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com 2008-05-19 08:20 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, opinions backed by real money are always likely to be more valuable!

I've been surprised too by how non-savvy Betfair users can be. You expect customers of terrestrial bookies to eg. over-favour England teams, but I was expecting that on Betfair that would always be balanced by savvy customers moving the other way.